Perspective - International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology (2022) Volume 17, Issue 7
Double danger: The peril of childbirth for women with rheumatic heart disease
Stuart L Silverman*
Cedars-Sinai Medical center/ UCLA, CA, USA
Received: 01-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. IJCR-22-122; Editor assigned: 04-Jul-2022, PreQC No. IJCR-22-122(PQ); Reviewed: 18-Jul-2022, QC No. IJCR-22-122; Revised: 23-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. IJCR-22-122(R); Published: 30-Jul-2022 DOI: 10.37532/1758-4272.2022.17(6).122-123
Abstract
Introduction
Women of childbearing age who suffer from Rheumatic Heart Disease in low- to moderateincome countries like Uganda face a double danger: Increased risk of complications during pregnancy - including death - while also bearing a cultural burden and expectation that they'll become mothers, according to a new study.
Today, most people in the United States rarely think of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) - or the rheumatic fever that causes it - as more than a historical footnote.
Rheumatic fever, which usually starts as strep throat, was essentially eliminated as a lifethreatening disease with the use of penicillin in the early 20th century [1].
But for much of the developing world, RHD still kills. Estimates range that between a quarter-million to 330,000 people a year die from what has been called the "disease of poverty" across Africa, the Middle East, Central and South Asia and the South Pacific.
Worse, women of childbearing age who suffer from RHD face a double danger: They face increased risk of complications during pregnancy - including death - while also bearing a cultural burden and expectation that they'll become mothers [2].
That was among the findings in a recent study in Uganda led by researcher. The survey of 75 women last year is among the first qualitative studies of female RHD patients and their attitudes toward cardiovascular disease and reproduction [3].
Conclusion
The study has its origins in clinical observations at the Ugandan Heart Institute. A health-care provider there was hearing from women who were cautioned by their doctors about the dangers of bearing and delivering children- but who were also being told by their families and community that they must get pregnant [4,5].
Tension between maintaining one's own health and the social expectation of becoming pregnant was clearly illustrated in the Ugandan study. Our findings suggest that health programs targeting RHD in low- to moderateincome countries have to pay special attention to female patients of childbearing age.
References
- Hyman AS. Sudden Heart Failure as a Public Health Menace. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 19(10), 1103-1110 (1929).
- Brook RD, Newby DE, Rajagopalan S. The global threat of outdoor ambient air pollution to cardiovascular health: time for intervention. JAMA cardiol. 2(4), 353-354 (2017).
- Herrick WW. Pregnancy and Heart Disease From A Medical Viewpoint: Report of a Study of Forty Cases from the Sloane Maternity Hospital, New York City. Am J Obst Gynecol. 4(1), 1-18 (1922).
- Reddy KS. Cardiovascular diseases in the developing countries: dimensions, determinants, dynamics and directions for public health action. Public health nutr. 5(1a), 231-237 (2002).
- Cohen KM, Minehart RD, Leffert LR. Anesthetic treatment of cardiac disease during pregnancy. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 20(8), 1-12 (2018).
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref