Short Communication - International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology (2022) Volume 17, Issue 9

New model can predict best drug combinations for osteoporosis

EF Borba*

Rheumatology Division, University of São Paulo, Brazil

*Corresponding Author:
EF Borba Rheumatology Division, University of São Paulo, Brazil E-mail: reumato@edu.usp.br

Received: 01-Sep-2022, Manuscript No. IJCR-22-145; Editor assigned: 02-Sep-2022, PreQC No. IJCR-22-145(PQ); Reviewed: 16-Sep-2022, QC No. IJCR-22-145; Revised: 21-Sep-2022, Manuscript No. IJCR-22- 145(R); Published: 28-Sep-2022; DOI: 10.37532/1758-4272.2022.17(9).145-146

Abstract

Introduction

The model, described today in eLife, may help improve outcomes for patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and reduce the risks of side effects by helping physicians build more personalised treatment regimes.

The sudden loss of the hormone oestrogen during menopause can interfere with the body's natural processes for repairing natural wear and tear on bones, leading to more weakened bones and possible fractures. Several drugs are available to treat this type of postmenopausal bone loss [1]. While these treatments can be combined, there is little evidence to suggest what the most effective combinations might be.

About the Study

We wanted to know if there are treatment combinations that would work considerably better than those tested and currently used in clinical practice. If so, then this could be beneficial for treating a large number of osteoporosis patients by increasing their bone strength and reducing their risk of bone fracture risk more than standard therapies currently allow.

To explore this further, colleagues built a mathematical model of bone renewal that predicts the effects of various osteoporosis medications in postmenopausal women [2]. They based the model on the latest evidence of how old bone breaks down and new bone is created, as well as how different classes of osteoporosis medications work. They then verified the accuracy of the model by testing its predictions on data from clinical trials.

Next, the team tested the effects of reshuffling the order of different osteoporosis medications.

Their model showed that some combinations in a particular order would perform significantly better than others [3]. They also found that combinations that cause the most rapid increases in bone density do not always strengthen bone in the long term and can instead cause a rebound of accelerated bone loss after the treatment stops [4]. These results show us why the order in which osteoporosis medications are taken is important for short and long-term treatment success in patients.

While the model was specific to postmenopausal women, the authors say it could be adapted to help design treatment combinations for patients with bone loss caused by other medications or medical conditions [5]. For example, it could be beneficial for those who take corticosteroid medications or who have hyperparathyroidism and gastrointestinal diseases.

Conclusion

As our model could potentially predict the effects of a broad range of complex drug combination therapies beyond those used for its development, it could be used for the design of future clinical trials.

Kotanko adds that general limitations of the model need to be considered when using it as a predictive tool, especially when applying the data to extreme dosing regimens, dosing frequencies or age regions beyond those validated in the study. However, we've shown that not only can the model be used as a starting point for forecasting osteoporosis therapy success, but it also highlights the role of mathematical descriptions in helping us understand the biological principles of how drugs work.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hung TNK, Le NQK, Le NH et al. An AI‐based Prediction Model for Drug‐drug Interactions in Osteoporosis and Paget's Diseases from SMILES. Mol Inform. 41, 2100264 (2022).
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Ross PD, Genant HK, Davis JW et al. Predicting vertebral fracture incidence from prevalent fractures and bone density among non-black, osteoporotic women. Osteoporos Int. 3, 120-126 (1993).
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Lin YT, Chu CY, Hung KS et al. Can machine learning predict pharmacotherapy outcomes? An application study in osteoporosis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 225, 107028 (2022).
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Engels A, Reber KC, Lindlbauer I et al. Osteoporotic hip fracture prediction from risk factors available in administrative claims data–A machine learning approach. PloS one. 15, e0232969 (2020).
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Hernandez CJ, Beaupre GS, Carter DR. A theoretical analysis of the relative influences of peak BMD, age-related bone loss and menopause on the development of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 14, 843-847 (2003).
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase

Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 6123

International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology received 6123 citations as per Google Scholar report


International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

flyer
Recommended Conferences