ISSN: 1755-5310 (Electronic)1755-5302 (Print)

Interventional Cardiology

Citations Report

Interventional Cardiology : Citations & Metrics Report

Articles published in Interventional Cardiology have been cited by esteemed scholars and scientists all around the world.

Interventional Cardiology has got h-index 15, which means every article in Interventional Cardiology has got 15 average citations.

Following are the list of articles that have cited the articles published in Interventional Cardiology.

  2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009

Total published articles

 42 60 59 65 52 22 24 47 31 60 71 85 85 85 100 30

Research, Review articles and Editorials

 35 35 31 39 27 9 10 25 11 38 42 50 47 46 65 18

Research communications, Review communications, Editorial communications, Case reports and Commentary

25 25 38 26 25 13 14 22 20 22 28 35 38 39 35 12

Citations received as per Google Scholar, other indexing platforms and portals

 93 110 149 161 129 116 148 121 90 88 58 41 26 15 34 0
Journal total citations count 1400
Journal impact factor 1.34
Journal 5 years impact factor 2.88
Journal cite score 2.98
Journal h-index 15
Journal h-index since 2019 10
Journal Impact Factor 2020 formula
IF= Citations(y)/{Publications(y-1)+ Publications(y-2)} Y= Year
Journal 5-year Impact Factor 2020 formula
Citations(2016 + 2017 + 2018 + 2019 + 2020)/
{Published articles(2016 + 2017 + 2018 + 2019 + 2020)}
Journal citescore
Citescorey = Citationsy + Citationsy-1 + Citationsy-2 + Citations y-3 / Published articlesy + Published articlesy-1 + Published articlesy-2 + Published articles y-3
Flyer image

  • Kuwauchi S, Watanabe S, Abe K, Yamasaki M, Ito J, Kawazoe K. Thromboembolism in a patient with a mechanical mitral valve during anticoagulation with dabigatran etexilate. The. Annals. of. thoracic. surgery. 96:1863-1864 (2013).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Toeg H, Boodhwani M. Review of anticoagulation options for mechanical valve prosthesis. Interventional.Cardiology. 7: 273-281 (2015) .

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Heitzler VN, Pavlov M. Physiological basis of therapeutic approach to ivabradine use in new acute onset heart failure. Int.J.Clin.Exp.Phy. 1: 39 (2014) .

  • Geisler T, Gawaz M, Steinhubl SR, Bhatt DL, Storey RF, Flather M. Current strategies in antiplatelet therapy—Does identification of risk and adjustment of therapy contribute to more effective, personalized medicine in cardiovascular disease?. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 127(2): 95-107 (2010).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Ramoleta T, Schellack N, Bronkhorst E. An overview of ivabradine. South.African.Family.Practice. 58: 36-39 (2016.

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Negargar S, Anvari S, Abbasi K, Enamzadeh E. Immediate postoperative complications in patients undergoing CABG; investigating the role of prior coronary stenting. J. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Res. 6: 229 (2014).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Velicki L, Cemerlic‐Adjic N, Panic G, Jung R, Redzek A, Nicin S. CABG mortality is not influenced by prior PCI in low risk patients. J. Card. Surg. 28: 353-358 (2013).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Levine GN, Bakaeen FG. Adding CABG to the Dual Antiplatelet Salad. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 69: 128-130 (2017).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Shiryaev AA. Efficiency of Tactics of Microscurgeric Coronary Shunting In Patients With Renoissia Recondition After Stenting of Coronary Arteries. pp 1-138 (2014).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Gunning PS, Vaughan TJ, McNamara LM. Simulation of self expanding transcatheter aortic valve in a realistic aortic root: implications of deployment geometry on leaflet deformation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 42: 1989-2001 (2014).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Basalus MW, von Birgelen C. Benchside testing of drug-eluting stent surface and geometry. Interventl. Cardiol. 2(2): 159-175 (2010).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Gunning PS, Saikrishnan N, Yoganathan AP, McNamara LM. Total ellipse of the heart valve: the impact of eccentric stent distortion on the regional dynamic deformation of pericardial tissue leaflets of a transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 12: 20150737 (2015).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Vy P, Auffret V, Badel P, Rochette M, Le Breton H, Haigron P. Review of patient-specific simulations of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. International J. Adv. Eng. Sci. App. Math. 8: 2-4 (2016).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Dieter RS, Nanjundappa A. Expanding the horizons in cardiovascular interventions. Intevl. Cardiol. 1(2): 137-138 (2009).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Rahmani B, Tzamtzis S, Sheridan R, Mullen MJ, Yap J, Seifalian AM, Burriesci G. In Vitro Hydrodynamic Assessment of a New Transcatheter Heart Valve Concept (the TRISKELE). J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 27: 1-2 (2016).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Latacz P, Simka M, Ludyga T, Popiela TJ, Mrowiecki T. Endovascular thrombectomy with the AngioJet System for the treatment of intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism: a case report of two patients. Adv. in. Intervent. Cardio. 12: 43 (2016).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Dieter RS, Nanjundappa A. Expanding the horizons in cardiovascular interventions. Intevl. Cardiol. 1(2): 137-138 (2009).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Dieter RS, Nanjundappa A. Expanding the horizons in cardiovascular interventions. Intevl. Cardiol. 1(2): 137-138 (2009).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Dieter RS, Nanjundappa A. Expanding the horizons in cardiovascular interventions. Intevl. Cardiol. 1(2): 137-138 (2009).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Dieter RS, Nanjundappa A. Expanding the horizons in cardiovascular interventions. Intevl. Cardiol. 1(2): 137-138 (2009).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Latacz P, Majewski E, Piwowarczyk M. Technique of endovascular rheolytic thrombectomy using angiojet for treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. Postepy. Kardiol. Interwencyjnej. 12: 61-64 (2016).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Byrne RA, Kastrati A. Biodegradable polymer limus-eluting stents are noninferior to permanent polymer-based stents: the ISAR-TEST-4 trial. Intervl. Cardiol. 2(3): 267-273 (2010).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Sun Z. Comment on: Diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 168: 4895-4896 (2013).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Langan DA, Claus BE, Al Assad O, Trousset Y, Riddell C, Avignon G, Solomon SB, Lai H, Wang X. Interventional C-arm tomosynthesis for vascular imaging: initial results. InSPIE. Medi. Imag 18 pp (2015).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • McFadden S, Hughes C, D'Helft CI, McGee A, Rainford L, Brennan PC. The establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for paediatric interventional cardiology. Radiography. 19: 295-301 (2013).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Kumar A. Innovative Approaches in the field of Cardiology. Research & Reviews. BioSciences. 11: 3 (2016).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • van de Hoef TP, van Lavieren MA, Damman P, et al. Physiological basis and long-term clinical outcome of discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve in coronary stenoses of intermediate severity. Circulation: Cardiovascl. Intervtns.  7(3): 301-311 (2014).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • van de Hoef TP, Nolte F, Rolandi MC, et al. Coronary pressure-flow relations as basis for the understanding of coronary physiology. J. mol. cel. cardiol. 52(4): 786-793 (2012).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Afreen RG. Chocolate-Canis Lupus Familiaris. RRJZS. Special Issue-S1.

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Van De Hoef TP, Meuwissen M, et al. Fractional flow reserve as a surrogate for inducible myocardial ischaemia. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 10(8): 439-452 (2013).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • van de Hoef TP, Siebes M, Spaan JA, Piek JJ. Fundamentals in clinical coronary physiology: why coronary flow is more important than coronary pressure. Eur. heart. j.  1: ehv235 (2015).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Suzuki T, Shiga T, Omori H, Tatsumi F, Nishimura K, Hagiwara N. Adherence to medication and characteristics of Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. J Cardiol.19 ( 2016).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Rolandi MC, Nolte F, van de Hoef TP, et al. Coronary wave intensity during the Valsalva manoeuvre in humans reflects altered intramural vessel compression responsible for extravascular resistance. J. physiol. 590(18): 4623-4635 (2012).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  • Anand N. Research & Reviews: Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Srividya B. Drugs Acting on Blood Coagulation system and their Mechanism of Action: A review.

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  • Afreen RG. Chocolate-Canis Lupus Familiaris. RRJZS. Special Issue-S1. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • van de Hoef TP, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ. Fractional flow reserve and beyond. Heart. 99(22): 1699-1705 (2013).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Afreen RG. Chocolate-Canis Lupus Familiaris. RRJZS. Special Issue-S1.

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • van de Hoef TP, Echavarría-Pinto M, Van Lavieren MA, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of coronary flow capacity: a comprehensive cross-modality physiological concept in ischemic heart disease. JACC: Cardiovascul. Intervnts. 8(13): 1670-1680 (2015).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • van de Hoef TP, van Lavieren MA, Henriques JP, Piek JJ, Claessen BE. Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: does coronary pressure never lie?. Curr. trea. optns. cardiovascul. med. 16(4): 1-4 (2014).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • van de Hoef TP, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ. Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: where to after FAME 2? Vascul. healt. risk. manag. 11: 613 (2015).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Nolte F, van de Hoef T, van Lavieren M, et al. Impact of hyperemic microvascular resistance on the functional consequences of fractional flow reserve-identified significant coronary stenoses in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Improved assessment of functional severity of coronary artery stenosis by analysis of combined intracoronary pressure and flow velocity signals. 8: 139 (2014).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
  • van de Hoef TP. SOURCE (OR PART OF THE FOLLOWING SOURCE): Type PhD thesis Title Novel insights into the complexity of ischaemic heart disease derived from combined coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Pasipoularides A. Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Part 1—Molecular Pathogenetic Aspects, Hemodynamics, and Adaptive Feedbacks. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 9: 102-118 (2016).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • van de Hoef TP, Nolte F, Siebes M, et al.“Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Intracoronary Pressure and Flow Velocity Information During Baseline Conditions: Adenosine-Free Assessment of Functional Coronary Lesion Severity”. Circulation: Cardiovascul. Intervents. 5(6): e86-7 (2012).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • van de Hoef TP. UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository). J. Interventl. Cardiol. 25(6): 549-556 (2015).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Veith FJ. A look at the future of vascular surgery. J. Vasc. Surg.64: 885-890 ( 2016).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Paraskevas KI, Veith FJ. Techniques and innovations to improve carotid artery stenting outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 222: 986-987 (2016).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Dieter RS, Nanjundappa A. Cardiovascular interventions: pushing the limits. Interv. Cardiol. 2(1): 1 (2010).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar

  • Kedev S, Petkoska D, Zafirovska B, Vasilev I, Bertrand OF. Safety of slender 5Fr transradial approach for carotid artery stenting with a novel nitinol double-layer micromesh stent. Am. J. Cardiol. 116: 977-981 (2015).

    View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar
Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase

Journal Metrics:

Impact Factor 1.34
Scimago Journal Rank (SJR) 123
SJR Total Cites 15
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 0.144
h-index (2023) 12
PubMed NLM ID:  10148499
Google Scholar h5 index: 6
Iindex Copernicus Value: 105.52


Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 1400

Interventional Cardiology received 1400 citations as per Google Scholar report

Citation image

Interventional Cardiology peer review process verified at publons
Publon image

Indexed In

flyer